Su-Kam Power System Ltd. & Anr. vs State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
The petitioners challenged attachment and recovery proceedings initiated for VAT, CST and GST dues after the company was sold as a going concern under the IBC. The factual background showed that statutory dues were treated as operational debt and settled under the approved acquisition plan.
The Court held that once the resolution and acquisition plan attained finality, all prior claims stood extinguished. Recovery proceedings initiated thereafter were held to be illegal and were quashed.
Case laws referred:
Ghanashyam Mishra & Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd., (2021) 9 SCC 657
Other Case Law
Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Others
Constitutional Validity of GST Levy on Lotteries under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
The petitioner, Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challengi...
Read MoreCase laws referred: S/s Dinesh Kumar Pradeep Kumar v. Additional Commissioner, Grade-II, 2024 SCC OnLine All 2846 M/s Janta Machine Tools v. State of U.P., 2025 SCC OnLine All 1763 M/s Nikhil Trade & Exports vs Additional Commissioner Grade-II (Appeals) &
Invalid initiation of confiscation proceedings for alleged excess stock
The petitioner challenged orders passed in appeal confirming proceedings under S...
Read MoreA.O. Smith India Water Products Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Karnataka & Ors.
GST demand on equity infusion and ECB transactions
The petitioner challenged a show cause notice proposing levy of IGST on equity c...
Read More