Flipkart India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Ors.
The petitioner sought refund of the entire pre-deposit made during VAT appellate proceedings, part of which was paid in cash and part by utilisation of ITC. Although the appellate proceedings culminated in favour of the petitioner, the department refunded only the cash component and withheld the portion paid through ITC.
The Court held that once the appeal is finally decided in favour of the assessee, the entire pre-deposit is liable to be refunded in cash in terms of the transitional provisions. Retention of the amount paid through ITC was held to be without authority of law. Directions were issued to refund the balance amount with applicable interest.
Case laws referred:
Union of India v. Bundl Technologies Pvt. Ltd., (2022) 136 taxmann.com 112 (Kar.)
Diwakar Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, CGST, 2023 (5) Centax 256 (P&H)
Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Union of India, 1999 (106) ELT 3 (SC)
Other Case Law
Udit Tibrewal vs State of Assam & Ors.
Validity of assessment order passed without proper show cause notice under Section 73
The petitioner challenged an assessment order passed under Section 73 of the Ass...
Read MoreM/s SPK and Co. vs State Tax Officer
Validity of assessment and rectification orders following alleged vague show cause notice
The petitioner challenged assessment orders and subsequent rectification orders ...
Read MoreGoa Shipyard Limited vs Shoft Shipyard Pvt. Ltd.
GST liability on interest and costs awarded in arbitral proceedings
The petitioner challenged execution court orders directing payment of GST on int...
Read More