Patanjali Foods Limited vs Assistant Commissioner / Deputy Commissioner, State Tax & Ors.
The petitioner challenged GST demand-cum-adjudication orders for periods prior to approval of a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The factual background showed that the resolution plan was approved by the NCLT and attained finality after dismissal of appeal by the NCLAT.
The Court held that once a resolution plan is approved, all prior statutory dues stand extinguished unless specifically preserved. Consequently, GST demands relating to the pre-resolution period were held to be unenforceable and were set aside.
Case laws referred:
Ghanashyam Mishra & Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Edelweiss ARC, (2021) 9 SCC 657
Other Case Law
M/s Kundlas Loh Udyog vs State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr.
Blocking of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A without jurisdiction
The petitioner challenged blocking of ITC under Rule 86A on the basis of alleged...
Read MoreSance Laboratories Private Limited vs Union of India & Ors.
Validity of prolonged investigation and withholding of export refunds by DGGI
The petitioners challenged prolonged investigation by the Directorate General of...
Read MoreManikonda Rama Rao vs Deputy Commissioner (CT) & Ors.
Declaration of property transfer as void for alleged tax evasion
The petitioner challenged proceedings declaring a property sale as void under Se...
Read More