Jyoti Tar Products Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs Deputy Commissioner, State Tax & Ors.
The petitioners challenged a show cause notice under Section 74 alleging wrongful availment of ITC on the basis that suppliers were non-existent or subsequently deregistered. The factual background showed that all statutory conditions under Section 16 were fulfilled and no proceedings were initiated against suppliers.
The Court held that ITC cannot be denied to the recipient without first initiating action against defaulting suppliers, unless exceptional circumstances exist. The impugned show cause notice was set aside.
Case laws referred:
Arise India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes, (2018) 9 GSTL 3 (Del.)
Other Case Law
Map Overseas vs Union of India & Ors.
Limitation for filing GST appeals beyond condonable period
The petitioner challenged dismissal of a GST appeal on the ground of limitation ...
Read MoreSouth Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors.
GST exemption on ancillary services related to transmission and distribution of electricity
The petitioners challenged levy of GST on ancillary services provided by electri...
Read MoreUnion of India & Another v. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd.
Validity of Levy of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on Ocean Freight
The respondent, Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Delhi...
Read More