info@gstindia.biz | +91-9876512345
GST INDIA Biz
GSTIndia.biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

Ziva Auto Sales Thru. Prop. Akhand Pratap and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. State Tax Lko. and Another

Date of Order: January 28, 2026
Case Law No: GIB-AHC-LKO-2026-1-DB
Subject: Whether interest not quantified in the show cause notice can be imposed in the adjudication order under Section 75(7) of the GST Act, 2017.
Download
Description:

The writ petition was allowed and the impugned order dated 11 February 2025 passed under Section 73(9) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, along with the show cause notice dated 13 November 2024, were quashed and set aside.

The Court held that Section 75(7) of the Act, 2017 mandates that the amount of tax, interest and penalty demanded in the order shall not exceed the amount specified in the show cause notice and no demand shall be confirmed on grounds other than those specified in the notice.

In the present case, the show cause notice did not quantify any interest for the period April 2020 to March 2021, though interest was later imposed in the adjudication order. The Court held that failure to quantify interest in the show cause notice, despite the relevant period being known to the authorities, was in contravention of Section 75(7).

The contention of the GST authorities relying on Section 75(9), that interest is payable whether or not specified in the order, was rejected. The Court held that Section 75(9) applies to non-specification of interest in the order determining tax liability, and not to non-quantification in the show cause notice.

Liberty was granted to the authorities to issue a fresh show cause notice in accordance with law and proceed afresh.

Cases Referred by Court:

  • M/s Vrinda Automation vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, Writ Tax No. 2006 of 2025, decided on 14 May 2025

Other Case Law

Sahulhameed v. The Commercial Tax Officer, Tuticorin-II

Validity of service of GST notices/orders through portal under Section 169 and compliance with principles of natural justice

Facts :The petitioner challenged assessment orders on the ground that notices an...

Read More
Radiant Cash Management Services Ltd. vs. Commercial Tax Officer

Validity of multiple show cause notices for same tax period – Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 142 of the CGST Rules, 2017.

Facts (Background):The petitioner challenged the show cause notice in Form GST D...

Read More
Mahalaxmi Cotton Ginning Pressing & Oil Industries v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Challenge to denial of input tax set-off under VAT law based on requirement of actual tax payment by selling dealer (Section involved: Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002)

Facts :The petitioner challenged the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 11....

Read More