Chaurasiya Zarda Bhandar vs State of U.P. & Others
The writ petition was allowed. The assessment and demand order dated 29.08.2024, as well as the consequential attachment order dated 11.09.2025, were quashed and set aside.
The Court held that the show cause notice for the financial year 2019–20 proposed recovery of tax amounting to Rs. 29,07,002/- and did not contain any proposal for imposition of interest or penalty.
However, the impugned order imposed interest and penalty under CGST and SGST totaling Rs. 55,71,191/-. The Court found that such imposition was contrary to Section 75(7), which provides that the amount of tax, interest and penalty demanded in the order shall not be in excess of the amount specified in the notice and no demand shall be confirmed on grounds other than those specified in the notice.
Since the show cause notice contained no reference to interest or penalty, the impugned order was held to be unsustainable and arbitrary.
The matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority to pass fresh orders in accordance with law.
Other Case Law
Guru and Co. & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Whether notifications issued by the Central Government under Sections 9 and 11 of the CGST Act, 2017 can travel beyond the recommendations of the GST Council, and whether the GST Council has the power to ratify a notification already issued by the Central
BackgroundThe petitioners are suppliers of pulses (Moong Dhal, Thoor Dhal) selli...
Read MoreR A and Co. vs The Additional Commissioner of Central Taxes
Show Cause Notice and adjudication – Clubbing of multiple financial years in a single show cause notice under Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 – validity of composite assessment order
Facts:The petitioner challenged Order-in-Original No.102/2025 dated 04.02.2025 c...
Read MoreD.P. Jain & Co. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors.
GST liability on Corporate Guarantee provided by a parent/holding company to banks on behalf of its subsidiary companies without any consideration — validity of CBIC Circular No. 204/16/2023 and Rule 28(2) of CGST Rules, 2017.
BACKGROUNDThe Petitioner, D.P. Jain & Co. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., is engag...
Read More