info@gstindia.biz | +91-9876512345
GST INDIA Biz
GSTIndia.biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

Chaurasiya Zarda Bhandar vs State of U.P. & Others

Date of Order: November 19, 2025
Case Law No: GIB-AHC-LKO-2025-04
Subject: Imposition of interest and penalty in assessment order without proposal in show cause notice under Section 75(7) of the GST Act.
Download
Description:

The writ petition was allowed. The assessment and demand order dated 29.08.2024, as well as the consequential attachment order dated 11.09.2025, were quashed and set aside.

The Court held that the show cause notice for the financial year 2019–20 proposed recovery of tax amounting to Rs. 29,07,002/- and did not contain any proposal for imposition of interest or penalty.

However, the impugned order imposed interest and penalty under CGST and SGST totaling Rs. 55,71,191/-. The Court found that such imposition was contrary to Section 75(7), which provides that the amount of tax, interest and penalty demanded in the order shall not be in excess of the amount specified in the notice and no demand shall be confirmed on grounds other than those specified in the notice.

Since the show cause notice contained no reference to interest or penalty, the impugned order was held to be unsustainable and arbitrary.

The matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority to pass fresh orders in accordance with law.

Cases Referred by Court:
No case law was referred to in the order.

 

 

Other Case Law

Ansal Housing and Construction Ltd. v. State of U.P. & Ors.

Refund of pre-deposit along with interest under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Sections 33, 40, 45, 47-A, 56 – Indian Stamp Act, 1899)

Facts :Petitioner deposited ₹34,67,438 as pre-deposit for filing appeal agains...

Read More
Zeba Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

Cancellation/annulment of bail – offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC involving forged educational degrees and organised fraud. Scope of appellate interference in bail orders; suppression of material facts and criminal antecedents in bail

Facts:An FIR was registered alleging an organised racket involving forged LL.B. ...

Read More
Instakart Services Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

Challenge to constitutional validity of denial of Input Tax Credit due to supplier default; liability of recipient under GST regime (Sections involved: Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017; Rule 36(4) of CGST/KGST Rules)

Facts The petitioner, a logistics service provider registered under GST, ch...

Read More