GST INDIA Biz
GST India .biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

Union of India & Ors. vs. Shantanu Sanjay Hundekari & Anr. Etc.

Date of Order: January 24, 2025
Case Law No: GIB-SC-2025-05
Subject: Challenge to Bombay High Court judgment quashing show cause notices imposing penalty under Sections 122(1A) and 137 of the CGST Act on an employee for alleged GST evasion by the company.
Description:

Court Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Bombay High Court.

The Court noted that the High Court had quashed the show cause notices seeking recovery of ₹3731 crores from the respondent, holding that:

  • The basic jurisdictional requirements were not attracted for invoking Section 122(1A) and Section 137 of the CGST Act.
  • No principle of vicarious liability could be read into Sections 122 and 137.
  • The respondent was merely an employee and could not be fastened with the liability alleged against the company.

The Supreme Court held that it saw no good reason to interfere with the common impugned orders passed by the High Court.

However, the Court clarified that the question of law regarding the interpretation of Sections 122(1A) and 137 of the CGST Act was kept open.

Accordingly, the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed and pending applications were disposed of.

 

Cases Referred by the Court

Other Case Law

Klassic Traders vs. State of Karnataka & Others

Quashing of ECL blocking order under Rule 86A of CGST Rules, 2017 passed without pre-decisional hearing and without independent 'reasons to believe', based solely on borrowed satisfaction from Enforcement authority reports

BackgroundThe petitioner, Klassic Traders, a proprietary concern registered unde...

Read More
Ziva Auto Sales Thru. Prop. Akhand Pratap and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. State Tax Lko. and Another

Whether interest not quantified in the show cause notice can be imposed in the adjudication order under Section 75(7) of the GST Act, 2017.

The writ petition was allowed and the impugned order dated 11 February 2025 pass...

Read More
Armour Security (India) Ltd. vs Commissioner, CGST, Delhi East Commissionerate & Anr.

Whether issuance of summons under Section 70 CGST Act amounts to “initiation of proceedings” under Section 6(2)(b) and bars parallel action by another authority.

Facts :The petitioner company received a show cause notice under Section 73 CGST...

Read More