info@gstindia.biz | +91-9876512345
GST INDIA Biz
GSTIndia.biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

Barjinder Singh Kohli vs The Assistant Commissioner of Revenue & Ors.

Date of Order: November 3, 2025
Case Law No: GSTIndiabiz/2025/05
Subject: Appeal – Sections 107(1), 107(4) & 107(6) of CGST Act, 2017 / WBGST Act, 2017 – requirement of pre-deposit when the order involves only interest and penalty without tax demand.
Download
Description:

Facts (Background):
The petitioner challenged an appellate order dated 15.05.2025 passed under Section 107 dismissing the appeal against an adjudication order under Section 74 dated 07.01.2025. The appeal was filed on 26.04.2025, beyond three months but within the condonable period of one month under Section 107(4). The appellate authority rejected the appeal on the grounds of delay and non-payment of pre-deposit though the adjudication order determined only interest and penalty and no tax demand.

Court Decision:
The Court held that under Section 107(6) as it stood at the time of filing the appeal, pre-deposit was required only in respect of the amount of tax in dispute. Since the impugned order involved only penalty and interest and there was no tax demand, there was no statutory requirement of pre-deposit. The Court observed that the proviso mandating pre-deposit even for penalty-only orders was inserted by the Finance Act, 2025 with effect from 01.10.2025 and was not applicable to the present case.

The Court found that the appellate authority erred in rejecting the appeal for non-payment of pre-deposit. The matter was remanded to the Appellate Authority to consider the petitioner’s application for condonation of delay. If the delay is condoned, the appellate authority shall hear the appeal on merits without insisting on pre-deposit.

Cases Referred by Court:
None mentioned in the order.

Other Case Law

Impressive Data Services Private Limited vs Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Tax GST, Delhi

Appeal – Mandatory pre-deposit under Section 107(6) of the CGST Act, 2017 – whether High Court can waive statutory pre-deposit for filing appeal.

Facts (Background):The petitioner challenged the requirement of pre-deposit unde...

Read More
Marfani Steel Impex, through its proprietor Mohammed Irfan Marfani vs The Principal Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax & Central Excise, Nagpur & Ors.

Show Cause Notice – Clubbing of multiple financial years under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 – validity of consolidated show cause notice for different tax periods.

Facts (Background):The petitioner challenged the show cause notice dated 30.05.2...

Read More
Vishwa Mitter vs. O. P. Poddar and Others,

Competency of a complainant to file a criminal complaint under Sections 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 read with Section 420 IPC, and whether a Magistrate can refuse to take cognizance on the ground that the complainant is not the

The appellant, Vishwa Mitter, was a dealer in beedies and the constituted attorn...

Read More