Barjinder Singh Kohli vs The Assistant Commissioner of Revenue & Ors.
Facts:
The petitioner challenged an appellate order dated 15.05.2025 passed under Section 107 dismissing the appeal against an adjudication order under Section 74 dated 07.01.2025. The appeal was filed on 26.04.2025, beyond three months but within the condonable period of one month under Section 107(4). The appellate authority rejected the appeal on the grounds of delay and non-payment of pre-deposit though the adjudication order determined only interest and penalty and no tax demand.
Court Decision:
The Court held that under Section 107(6) as it stood at the time of filing the appeal, pre-deposit was required only in respect of the amount of tax in dispute. Since the impugned order involved only penalty and interest and there was no tax demand, there was no statutory requirement of pre-deposit. The Court observed that the proviso mandating pre-deposit even for penalty-only orders was inserted by the Finance Act, 2025 with effect from 01.10.2025 and was not applicable to the present case.
The Court found that the appellate authority erred in rejecting the appeal for non-payment of pre-deposit. The matter was remanded to the Appellate Authority to consider the petitioner’s application for condonation of delay. If the delay is condoned, the appellate authority shall hear the appeal on merits without insisting on pre-deposit.
Other Case Law
State of Karnataka v. Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited
Interpretation of burden of proof for claiming Input Tax Credit under VAT law; requirement of proving genuineness of transactions (Section involved: Section 70 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003)
Facts:The respondent purchasing dealers claimed Input Tax Credit (ITC) on purcha...
Read MoreAgrawal Enterprises vs State of Gujarat & Ors.
Appeal – Limitation for filing appeal under Sections 107(1) and 107(4) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 – whether delay beyond the maximum period of 120 days can be condoned by High Court under Article 226.
Facts:The petitioner challenged the order dated 30.09.2025 by which the appellat...
Read MoreState of Karnataka v. M/s Tallam Apparels
Disallowance of Input Tax Credit on allegation of non-genuine transactions and non-payment of tax by selling dealer under VAT (Sections involved: Section 70(1), Section 39(1), and relevant provisions of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003)
Facts :The assessee, a registered dealer dealing in garments, claimed input tax ...
Read More