Laxmi Motors vs State of M.P. and Others
Facts:
The petitioner challenged the order dated 13.08.2025 passed by the Appellate Authority dismissing the appeal as time-barred. The appeal was filed on 25.11.2024 against the adjudication order dated 26.07.2024. The petitioner contended that the limitation period of three months under Section 107(1) should be computed from the next day of the order and that the appeal was filed within the additional condonable period of one month under Section 107(4).
Court Decision:
The Court held that under Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, the day on which the order is passed must be excluded while computing the limitation period. Accordingly, the three-month limitation under Section 107(1) commenced from 27.07.2024 and expired on 27.10.2024. The further condonable period of one month under Section 107(4) extended up to 26.11.2024. Since the appeal was filed on 25.11.2024, it was within the permissible period.
The Court set aside the order of the appellate authority which had incorrectly treated the appeal as time-barred and directed that the appeal be decided on merits.
Cases Referred by Court:
· State of Himachal Pradesh and Another v. Himachal Techno Engineers and Another, (2010) 12 SCC 210
· Bibi Salma Khatoon v. State of Bihar, (2001) 7 SCC 197
· Dodds v. Walker, (1981) 1 WLR 1027; (1981) 2 All ER 609
Other Case Law
Armour Security (India) Ltd. vs Commissioner, CGST, Delhi East Commissionerate & Anr.
Whether issuance of summons under Section 70 CGST Act amounts to “initiation of proceedings” under Section 6(2)(b) and bars parallel action by another authority.
Facts :The petitioner company received a show cause notice under Section 73 CGST...
Read MoreBengal Engineering vs State of West Bengal & Ors
Legality of GST assessment exceeding Show Cause Notice amount and denial of personal hearing under Sections 75(7) and 75(4) of the West Bengal GST Act, 2017.
The Division Bench allowed the appeal and set aside the Adjudication Order dated...
Read MoreReliance Jio Infocom Ltd. vs Union of India & Others
Validity of Rule 39(1)(a) CGST Rules mandating same-month distribution of ITC by Input Service Distributor (ISD).
Facts :The petitioner, a telecom service provider with multiple GST registration...
Read More