GST INDIA Biz — Show Cause Notice and adjudication – Clubbing of multiple financial years in a single show cause notice/order under the CGST Act, 2017 – validity of consolidated proceedings for different tax periods.

Instakart Services Private Limited vs The Additional Commissioner, Chennai South Commissionerate

Date of Order: February 22, 2025

Case Law No: GIB-MHC-2025-15

Subject: Show Cause Notice and adjudication – Clubbing of multiple financial years in a single show cause notice/order under the CGST Act, 2017 – validity of consolidated proceedings for different tax periods.

Description:

Facts:
The petitioner challenged Order-in-Original No.04/2025-GST ADC dated 06.01.2025 and the consequential rectification order dated 30.04.2025 passed for the period July 2017 to March 2023. The petitioner contended that the department issued a single show cause notice and passed a single order covering multiple financial years, which is contrary to the scheme of the GST Act.

Court Decision:
The Court held that under the GST Act, show cause notices must be issued based on the “tax period”. Where the assessment is based on annual returns, the relevant tax period corresponds to the respective financial year.

The Court relied on its earlier decision dated 21.07.2025 in a batch of cases holding that show cause notices cannot be clubbed for more than one financial year. Since the impugned order covered the period from July 2017 to March 2023 through a single proceeding, the action was held to be without jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the Court quashed the assessment order dated 06.01.2025 and the rectification order dated 30.04.2025 and granted liberty to the department to initiate separate proceedings for each financial year in accordance with law.

Cases Referred by Court: W.P. Nos.29716 of 2024 etc. batch (Madras High Court, Order dated 21.07.2025)

Other Case Law

King Enterprises vs. Union of India & Ors.

Validity of "negative blocking" of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, 2017, i.e., blocking ITC in excess of the actual credit balance available in the Electronic Credit Ledger.

Background & Relevant FactsThe petitioner, King Enterprises, challenged an o...

Instakart Services Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

Challenge to constitutional validity of denial of Input Tax Credit due to supplier default; liability of recipient under GST regime (Sections involved: Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017; Rule 36(4) of CGST/KGST Rules)

Facts The petitioner, a logistics service provider registered under GST, ch...

Alfa Group vs The Assistant State Tax Officer & Others

Whether goods can be detained under GST law on the ground of undervaluation compared to MRP and alleged wrong HSN classification.

Facts :The petitioner’s goods were detained during transit through a detention...