Instakart Services Private Limited vs The Additional Commissioner, Chennai South Commissionerate
Facts:
The petitioner challenged Order-in-Original No.04/2025-GST ADC dated 06.01.2025 and the consequential rectification order dated 30.04.2025 passed for the period July 2017 to March 2023. The petitioner contended that the department issued a single show cause notice and passed a single order covering multiple financial years, which is contrary to the scheme of the GST Act.
Court Decision:
The Court held that under the GST Act, show cause notices must be issued based on the “tax period”. Where the assessment is based on annual returns, the relevant tax period corresponds to the respective financial year.
The Court relied on its earlier decision dated 21.07.2025 in a batch of cases holding that show cause notices cannot be clubbed for more than one financial year. Since the impugned order covered the period from July 2017 to March 2023 through a single proceeding, the action was held to be without jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the Court quashed the assessment order dated 06.01.2025 and the rectification order dated 30.04.2025 and granted liberty to the department to initiate separate proceedings for each financial year in accordance with law.
Cases Referred by Court: W.P. Nos.29716 of 2024 etc. batch (Madras High Court, Order dated 21.07.2025)
Other Case Law
Barjinder Singh Kohli vs The Assistant Commissioner of Revenue & Ors.
Appeal – Sections 107(1), 107(4) & 107(6) of CGST Act, 2017 / WBGST Act, 2017 – requirement of pre-deposit when the order involves only interest and penalty without tax demand.
Facts:The petitioner challenged an appellate order dated 15.05.2025 passed under...
Read MoreThe Commissioner of Central Tax, Mysore Audit Commissionerate & Ors. vs. Sadguru Infratech Pvt Ltd.
Whether a writ court can direct the GST authorities to permit filing/amendment of returns while waiving interest, penalty and limitation under the GST Acts, and to refrain from precipitative action, in respect of the incremental tax burden arising from th
BackgroundThis is the Revenue's appeal against a Single Judge order dated 11.04....
Read MoreA.G. and Sons HUF & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Whether an order passed under the CGST Act by an officer who did not personally conduct the hearing violates the principle of natural justice — specifically the maxim
BackgroundAn impugned order dated 30th December 2025 was passed by Mr. Debjit Ba...
Read More