Instakart Services Private Limited vs The Additional Commissioner, Chennai South Commissionerate
Facts:
The petitioner challenged Order-in-Original No.04/2025-GST ADC dated 06.01.2025 and the consequential rectification order dated 30.04.2025 passed for the period July 2017 to March 2023. The petitioner contended that the department issued a single show cause notice and passed a single order covering multiple financial years, which is contrary to the scheme of the GST Act.
Court Decision:
The Court held that under the GST Act, show cause notices must be issued based on the “tax period”. Where the assessment is based on annual returns, the relevant tax period corresponds to the respective financial year.
The Court relied on its earlier decision dated 21.07.2025 in a batch of cases holding that show cause notices cannot be clubbed for more than one financial year. Since the impugned order covered the period from July 2017 to March 2023 through a single proceeding, the action was held to be without jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the Court quashed the assessment order dated 06.01.2025 and the rectification order dated 30.04.2025 and granted liberty to the department to initiate separate proceedings for each financial year in accordance with law.
Cases Referred by Court: W.P. Nos.29716 of 2024 etc. batch (Madras High Court, Order dated 21.07.2025)
Other Case Law
Sri Padmavathi Marketing v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Scope of Rule 86A – Whether ITC can be blocked for supplier when alleged wrongful availment is by recipient.
Case Facts:The petitioner challenged a show-cause notice proposing blocking of I...
Read MoreArhaan Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
Detention/confiscation of goods under Sections 129 & 130 where proceedings were initiated against an alleged fictitious seller.
BackgroundThe petitioners challenged the detention of iron scrap and the vehicle...
Read MoreNoordeen Enterprises & MNS Enterprises vs. Additional Director General, DGGI & Additional Commissioner of CGST, South Commissionerate
Validity of letters issued by DGGI to customers of the petitioner-taxpayers, directing those customers to remit amounts payable to the petitioners directly to the GST authorities — issued at a stage when no order-in-original determining tax liability ha
BACKGROUNDThe petitioners are suppliers of goods. During the course of investiga...
Read More