Radiant Cash Management Services Ltd. vs. Commercial Tax Officer
Facts:
The petitioner challenged the show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 23.09.2025 issued under Section 73 of the GST enactments for the tax period 2021-2022. The challenge was mainly on the ground that an earlier intimation in Form DRC-01A dated 06.05.2025 and a show cause notice dated 29.05.2025 had already been issued for the same tax period, and therefore another show cause notice could not be issued.
Court Decision:
The High Court held that there is no bar under the GST enactments for issuance of multiple show cause notices for the same tax period if they relate to different discrepancies or subject matters. The Court observed that the earlier proceedings and the impugned show cause notice dealt with different issues except for a limited overlap relating to exempt supplies.
The Court further held that the petitioner should submit a reply to the impugned show cause notice and raise all permissible defences before the adjudicating authority. Accordingly, the writ petition challenging the show cause notice was dismissed, with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a reply within 30 days and contest the proceedings on merits.
Cases Referred by Court:
- Duncans Industries Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
- Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata
- Avery India Ltd. vs. Union of India
- ALM Industries Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner (AE) Central Goods and Services
- H.A. Shah and Co. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
- Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd.
- Workmen of Cochin Port Trust vs. Board of Trustees of the Cochin Port Trust
- Singh Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur
Other Case Law
Ziva Auto Sales Thru. Prop. Akhand Pratap and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. State Tax Lko. and Another
Whether interest not quantified in the show cause notice can be imposed in the adjudication order under Section 75(7) of the GST Act, 2017.
The writ petition was allowed and the impugned order dated 11 February 2025 pass...
Read MoreBest Road Carriers vs. Principal Commissioner of CGST, Alwar
Whether a transporter who merely transports goods by road without issuing a consignment note is a Goods Transport Agency (GTA) liable to service tax, or a Goods Transport Operator (GTO) covered under the negative list under Section 66D(p) of the Finance A
BACKGROUNDThe appellant is engaged in the activity of transportation of goods by...
Read MoreMaruti Enterprise v. Union of India & Ors.
Constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be denied to a bona fide purchasing dealer solely on account of the supplier's failure to deposit tax with the Government.
BACKGROUNDA group of petitioners (purchasing dealers) challenged Section 16(2)(c...
Read More