Radiant Cash Management Services Ltd. vs. Commercial Tax Officer
Facts:
The petitioner challenged the show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 23.09.2025 issued under Section 73 of the GST enactments for the tax period 2021-2022. The challenge was mainly on the ground that an earlier intimation in Form DRC-01A dated 06.05.2025 and a show cause notice dated 29.05.2025 had already been issued for the same tax period, and therefore another show cause notice could not be issued.
Court Decision:
The High Court held that there is no bar under the GST enactments for issuance of multiple show cause notices for the same tax period if they relate to different discrepancies or subject matters. The Court observed that the earlier proceedings and the impugned show cause notice dealt with different issues except for a limited overlap relating to exempt supplies.
The Court further held that the petitioner should submit a reply to the impugned show cause notice and raise all permissible defences before the adjudicating authority. Accordingly, the writ petition challenging the show cause notice was dismissed, with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a reply within 30 days and contest the proceedings on merits.
Cases Referred by Court:
- Duncans Industries Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi
- Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata
- Avery India Ltd. vs. Union of India
- M/s ALM Industries Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner (AE) Central Goods and Services
- H.A. Shah and Co. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
- Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd.
- Workmen of Cochin Port Trust vs. Board of Trustees of the Cochin Port Trust
- Singh Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur
Other Case Law
Golden Traders & Others vs Deputy Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Others
Legality of detention/confiscation of goods in transit under Section 129 CGST/SGST Act on ground of undervaluation and entitlement to release.
Facts :The petitioners’ goods and vehicles were intercepted and detained under...
Read MoreKanhaiya Nilambar Jha vs. Union of India & Ors.
: Legality of summons and alleged illegal detention during GST inquiry – Sections 69, 70 and 132 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Facts :The petitioner alleged that GST officers illegally detained him from 17.0...
Read MoreOn Quest Merchandising India Pvt. Ltd. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Challenge to constitutional validity of denial of Input Tax Credit to purchasing dealers due to default of selling dealers under DVAT (Section involved: Section 9(2)(g) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004)
Facts :The petitioners, registered dealers under the DVAT Act, claimed Input Tax...
Read More