GST INDIA Biz
GST India .biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

Tvl R.P.G. Traders vs. State Tax Officer & Anr.

Date of Order: December 12, 2025
Case Law No: GIB-MHC-2025-22
Subject: Levy of late fee and general penalty for non-filing of annual return – Sections 47, 125 and 73 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act, 2017.
Description:

Facts:
The petitioner failed to file the annual return under Section 44 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act for the relevant period. The State Tax Officer passed an order dated 26.02.2025 levying late fee of ₹75,025 under CGST and ₹75,025 under SGST (₹1,50,050 total) under Section 47 and additionally imposed general penalty of ₹50,000 under Section 125. The petitioner challenged the order contending that once late fee is levied under Section 47, general penalty under Section 125 cannot be imposed and that the calculation of late fee was incorrect.

Court Decision:
The High Court held that Section 125 provides for general penalty only where no specific penalty is prescribed under the Act. Since the petitioner had already been subjected to late fee under Section 47 for failure to file the return, the levy of additional general penalty under Section 125 was not permissible. Accordingly, the general penalty of ₹50,000 was set aside.

With respect to the late fee, the Court held that the authority had incorrectly calculated the amount by duplicating it for CGST and SGST. The Court modified the late fee and directed that the petitioner shall pay ₹37,512.50 under SGST and ₹37,512.50 under CGST, totalling ₹75,025. Upon payment of the modified late fee, the bank was directed to permit the petitioner to operate the bank account which had been frozen.

Cases Referred by Court:

  • Order in W.P. No. 36614 of 2024, dated 04.02.2025 (Madras High Court).

Other Case Law

Mukesh Kumar Garg vs. Union of India & Others

Whether a writ petition is maintainable against a penalty order under Section 74 read with Section 122(1) of the CGST Act, when the petitioner — alleged mastermind of a fake ITC network of 28 firms — claims he is not a taxable person and that penalty,

BACKGROUNDThe Department conducted a detailed investigation and found that the p...

Read More
Shrinivasa Realcon (April 2025)

Whether a Development Agreement granting a developer the right to construct a multi-storied complex on the landowner's plot — without any purchase of TDR or FSI from any external person/entity — falls within Entry 5B of the GST Notification dated 28.0

BACKGROUND & FACTSShrinivasa Realcon Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner/developer) entere...

Read More
Blackberry India Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Assistant Commissioner,

Whether interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 on refund of unutilised CENVAT Credit is to be calculated from the date immediately after expiry of three months from the original refund app

Background & Relevant FactsThe petitioner, Blackberry India Pvt. Ltd., was e...

Read More