Tvl R.P.G. Traders vs. State Tax Officer & Anr.
Facts:
The petitioner failed to file the annual return under Section 44 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act for the relevant period. The State Tax Officer passed an order dated 26.02.2025 levying late fee of ₹75,025 under CGST and ₹75,025 under SGST (₹1,50,050 total) under Section 47 and additionally imposed general penalty of ₹50,000 under Section 125. The petitioner challenged the order contending that once late fee is levied under Section 47, general penalty under Section 125 cannot be imposed and that the calculation of late fee was incorrect.
Court Decision:
The High Court held that Section 125 provides for general penalty only where no specific penalty is prescribed under the Act. Since the petitioner had already been subjected to late fee under Section 47 for failure to file the return, the levy of additional general penalty under Section 125 was not permissible. Accordingly, the general penalty of ₹50,000 was set aside.
With respect to the late fee, the Court held that the authority had incorrectly calculated the amount by duplicating it for CGST and SGST. The Court modified the late fee and directed that the petitioner shall pay ₹37,512.50 under SGST and ₹37,512.50 under CGST, totalling ₹75,025. Upon payment of the modified late fee, the bank was directed to permit the petitioner to operate the bank account which had been frozen.
Cases Referred by Court:
- Order in W.P. No. 36614 of 2024, dated 04.02.2025 (Madras High Court).
Other Case Law
SPK and Co. vs The State Tax Officer
Appeal – Limitation for filing appeal under Section 107 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 – effect of rectification proceedings under Section 161 on computation of limitation.
Facts:The petitioner challenged the assessment order dated 07.08.2024 for the ye...
Read MoreTata Steel Limited vs. Union of India & Ors.
Whether a writ petition is maintainable before the High Court challenging proceedings under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, despite the existence of an alternative statutory remedy.
BACKGROUNDTata Steel Limited filed a Writ Petition (WPT No. 2485/2026) before th...
Read MoreNetgear Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner CGST, Karol Bagh Division, GST Delhi North & Another
Validity of Show Cause Notice issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 for recovery of refund already sanctioned pursuant to an Appellate Order and High Court direction, without alleging fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts
BackgroundNetgear Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. had filed a refund application cl...
Read More