GST INDIA Biz
GST India .biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

Anchor Shipping Services v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Date of Order: February 20, 2026
Case Law No: GIB-KHC-2026-20
Subject: Challenge to ex parte GST assessment orders on grounds of improper service and violation of natural justice
Description:

Facts :
The petitioner, a registered GST dealer, was subjected to assessment proceedings under Section 73 of the CGST/KGST Act for certain tax periods. Discrepancies were found between GSTR-3B, GSTR-1, and GSTR-2A returns, leading to issuance of show-cause notices through the GST portal. The petitioner contended that such notices and consequent ex parte orders were not effectively communicated and came to light only during recovery proceedings. Due to lack of knowledge, the statutory appeal period expired.

Court Decision:
The Court held that uploading notices on the GST portal is a valid mode of service under Section 169, and a registered dealer is expected to monitor such communications. However, since the impugned orders were ex parte and had serious civil consequences, the Court balanced equities and set aside the orders. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication subject to conditions: appearance before authority, filing objections, deposit of 20% of tax, and payment of ₹75,000 as costs. Non-compliance would result in revival of the original orders.

Other Case Law

Impressive Data Services Private Limited vs Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Tax GST, Delhi

Appeal – Mandatory pre-deposit under Section 107(6) of the CGST Act, 2017 – whether High Court can waive statutory pre-deposit for filing appeal.

Facts:The petitioner challenged the requirement of pre-deposit under Section 107...

Read More
State of Karnataka v. Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited

Interpretation of burden of proof for claiming Input Tax Credit under VAT law; requirement of proving genuineness of transactions (Section involved: Section 70 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003)

Facts:The respondent purchasing dealers claimed Input Tax Credit (ITC) on purcha...

Read More
Goisu Realty Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Provisional attachment of bank account under Section 83 of the MGST Act, 2017 in relation to alleged wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit under Section 17(5)(d). Scope and conditions for exercising power of provisional attachment when dispute is purely

Case Facts:The petitioner challenged an order dated 28 January 2025 passed under...

Read More