Vikas Chachan v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Facts :
The petitioner challenged the inability to file an appeal against assessment order dated 15.06.2023 due to delay. The order raised demand towards tax, interest and penalty for FY 2020–21. The petitioner contended that the order was only uploaded on the GST portal and not served physically, and due to closure of business, he did not access the portal. As a result, the petitioner remained unaware of the order and could not file appeal within limitation.
Court Decision:
The Court held that although the Appellate Authority is bound by limitation under Section 107, in the present case the delay occurred due to reasons beyond the petitioner’s control. It observed that non-consideration of appeal on merits would cause prejudice. Following earlier Division Bench decisions, the Court condoned the delay and directed the Appellate Authority to entertain the appeal and decide it on merits.
Cases Referred:
- M/s Molana Construction Company v. Central Goods and Service Tax Department & Ors.
- Man Singh Tanwar v. Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Department & Ors.
- RPC PSIPL JV v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Other Case Law
Impressive Data Services Private Limited vs Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Tax GST, Delhi
Appeal – Mandatory pre-deposit under Section 107(6) of the CGST Act, 2017 – whether High Court can waive statutory pre-deposit for filing appeal.
Facts (Background):The petitioner challenged the requirement of pre-deposit unde...
Read MoreA. M. Marketplaces Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors.
Demand and adjudication – Minimum time gap between issuance of notice and passing of order under Sections 73(2) and 73(10) of the CGST Act, 2017.
Facts (Background):The petitioner challenged the show cause notice dated 18.11.2...
Read MoreOm Enterprises vs. Union of India & Ors.
Cancellation of GST registration on vague show cause notice – Sections 29 and 30 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Facts (Background):The petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled by an order...
Read More