Simla Gomti Pan Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of State Tax U.P. & Ors.
Case Facts:
The department issued two show cause notices raising substantial tax, interest, and penalty demands against the petitioner.
The petitioner sought documents relied upon in the notices, but claimed inability to access them as they were uploaded on a different portal.
Due to this, no reply was filed and ex parte assessment orders were passed creating liability of about Rs. 159 crore.
The High Court declined to entertain the writ petition citing availability of alternative remedy under Section 107 requiring pre-deposit.
Court Decision:
The Court noted the petitioner’s grievance regarding lack of opportunity and financial difficulty in complying with the statutory pre-deposit.
It directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 3.50 crore within two weeks as a condition for further consideration of the matter.
Upon such deposit, notice was directed to be issued to the respondents.
The Court further ordered that no coercive steps shall be taken pursuant to the assessment orders subject to deposit.
Other Case Law
T.K. Navas v. Commissioner of Goods and Services Taxes & Ors.
Validity of service of GST notice through common portal under Section 169
Facts :The petitioner challenged an order passed under Section 73 of the CGST/SG...
Read MoreKanhaiya Nilambar Jha vs. Union of India & Ors.
: Legality of summons and alleged illegal detention during GST inquiry – Sections 69, 70 and 132 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Facts :The petitioner alleged that GST officers illegally detained him from 17.0...
Read MoreGoisu Realty Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Provisional attachment of bank account under Section 83 of the MGST Act, 2017 in relation to alleged wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit under Section 17(5)(d). Scope and conditions for exercising power of provisional attachment when dispute is purely
Case Facts:The petitioner challenged an order dated 28 January 2025 passed under...
Read More