Tirumala Milk Products Private Limited v. State Tax Officer
Case Facts:
The petitioner challenged an order dated 26.12.2025 confirming tax liability for FY 2018–19.
The show cause notice proposed a demand of Rs.1.37 crore, whereas the final order confirmed Rs.2.41 crore.
The petitioner contended that the order exceeded the scope of the show cause notice.
The writ petition was filed seeking quashing of both the show cause notice and consequential order.
Court Decision:
The Court held that the impugned order was contrary to Section 75(7) as it confirmed demand beyond what was proposed in the show cause notice.
The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted back to the authority for fresh consideration.
The petitioner was directed to file a reply within 30 days and the authority was directed to pass a fresh order after granting opportunity.
The authority was permitted to proceed in accordance with law in case of non-compliance by the petitioner.
Other Case Law
Om Prakash v. Islam Trading Co.
Validity of detention and penalty under Section 129(3) of the UPGST Act, 2017 for transportation of goods without an e-way bill under Rule 138(1). Whether subsequent generation of an e-way bill can cure the violation existing at the time of interception.
BACKGROUNDIron scrap being transported with tax invoices and other documents was...
Read MoreSuriya Cement Agency vs State Tax Officer,
Whether rejection of a Rectification Application filed by the assessee under Section 161 of the CGST/TNGST Act — without giving any reasons as to why no error is apparent on the face of record and without affording a personal hearing — is sustainable,
BackgroundAn Assessment Order dated 20th December 2023 was passed against the Pe...
Read MoreT.K. Navas v. Commissioner of Goods and Services Taxes & Ors.
Validity of service of GST notice through common portal under Section 169
Facts :The petitioner challenged an order passed under Section 73 of the CGST/SG...
Read More