Vinay Hiroo Thadani v. Deputy Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise & Ors.
Facts / Background:
The petitioner was issued a show cause notice seeking recovery of alleged wrongful ITC availed by his deceased father.
The father had passed away in September 2022, while the notice was issued in April 2024.
The petitioner contended that recovery proceedings under Sections 74 and 93 could not be initiated against him for liabilities of the deceased.
It was also argued that the adjudication order was passed without considering his reply, violating principles of natural justice.
Court Decision:
The Court held that considering the facts, the petitioner should be granted an opportunity of hearing before the adjudicating authority.
It directed the petitioner to appear before the authority and allowed him to raise all contentions, including on applicability of Sections 74 and 93.
The authority was directed to pass a fresh order after granting hearing and considering all submissions.
All issues, including challenge to statutory provisions, were kept open.
Cases Referred by Court:
No specific cases referred in the order.
Other Case Law
The State (NCT) of Delhi vs. Khimji Bhai Jadeja
Clubbing of FIRs / Same Transaction – Sections 218, 219, 220 & 223 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Sections 420 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
Facts (Background):An FIR was registered by the Economic Offences Wing, Delhi Po...
Read MoreShamhu Saran Agarwal and Company v. Additional Commissioner Grade-2 & Ors.
Legality of detention and penalty under Section 129 GST on ground of undervaluation of goods
Facts :The petitioner challenged a penalty order dated 20.12.2020 and appellate ...
Read MoreChandra Khilwani vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1)(4), Vadodara
Reassessment based on third-party Excel sheet – Sections 147, 148A(b), 148A(d), 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Facts (Background):The assessee, a retired school teacher, had not filed a retur...
Read More