Vinay Hiroo Thadani v. Deputy Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise & Ors.
Facts:
The petitioner was issued a show cause notice seeking recovery of alleged wrongful ITC availed by his deceased father.
The father had passed away in September 2022, while the notice was issued in April 2024.
The petitioner contended that recovery proceedings under Sections 74 and 93 could not be initiated against him for liabilities of the deceased.
It was also argued that the adjudication order was passed without considering his reply, violating principles of natural justice.
Court Decision:
The Court held that considering the facts, the petitioner should be granted an opportunity of hearing before the adjudicating authority.
It directed the petitioner to appear before the authority and allowed him to raise all contentions, including on applicability of Sections 74 and 93.
The authority was directed to pass a fresh order after granting hearing and considering all submissions.
All issues, including challenge to statutory provisions, were kept open.
Other Case Law
Gagandeep Singh and Another vs. State of H.P. and Another,
Applicability of CRPC to GST
Facts of the CaseThe complainant department filed Complaint No. GST/01/2018 befo...
Read MoreMunjaal Manishbhai Bhatt v. Union of India
Validity of mandatory 1/3rd deemed deduction towards land value under Paragraph 2 of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) for computing GST on construction services involving transfer of land.
BackgroundThe writ applicant, a practicing advocate, entered into an agreement d...
Read MoreTvl. Suguna Cutpiece Center & Batch vs. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST) & Others
Whether GST registrations cancelled under Section 29(2)(c) of CGST/TNGST Acts for non-filing of returns for a continuous period of six months can be restored by the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, even where the statutory period of limit
BACKGROUNDA batch of 27 Writ Petitions was filed by various small traders and bu...
Read More