Vinay Hiroo Thadani v. Deputy Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise & Ors.
Facts:
The petitioner was issued a show cause notice seeking recovery of alleged wrongful ITC availed by his deceased father.
The father had passed away in September 2022, while the notice was issued in April 2024.
The petitioner contended that recovery proceedings under Sections 74 and 93 could not be initiated against him for liabilities of the deceased.
It was also argued that the adjudication order was passed without considering his reply, violating principles of natural justice.
Court Decision:
The Court held that considering the facts, the petitioner should be granted an opportunity of hearing before the adjudicating authority.
It directed the petitioner to appear before the authority and allowed him to raise all contentions, including on applicability of Sections 74 and 93.
The authority was directed to pass a fresh order after granting hearing and considering all submissions.
All issues, including challenge to statutory provisions, were kept open.
Other Case Law
Kandan Hardware Mart & Others vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) & Others
Validity of levy of late fee under Section 47 and general penalty under Section 125 of GST Acts in light of Amnesty Notification No. 07/2023.
The petitioners challenged assessment orders and show cause notices imposing lat...
Read MoreSrei Equipment Finance Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner, DIV-III, CGST & C-EX, Navi Mumbai & Ors.
Continuation of CGST demand proceedings against a corporate debtor for a period prior to approval of its resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. At issue: whether statutory dues not forming part of an approved Resolution Plan stand
Background. The matter pertained to CGST dues for the assessment year 2020-...
Read MoreTirumala Milk Products Private Limited v. State Tax Officer
Validity of assessment order under Section 74 read with Section 75(7) of the CGST Act, 2017 where demand exceeds show cause notice. Scope of adjudication and limitation on confirming demand beyond proposal in show cause notice
Case Facts:The petitioner challenged an order dated 26.12.2025 confirming tax li...
Read More