Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, Delhi v. Arise India Limited
Facts:
The case arose from a batch of matters decided by the Delhi High Court concerning denial of input tax credit to purchasing dealers under the Delhi VAT Act. The tax authorities challenged the High Court’s ruling, which had granted relief to dealers claiming bona fide purchase transactions. The petitioner filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court against the High Court judgment dated 26.10.2017. The issue involved whether purchasing dealers could be denied input tax credit due to default by selling dealers.
Court Decision:
The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment of the Delhi High Court and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. The Court, however, granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the High Court with necessary particulars in cases where transactions were allegedly not bona fide and seek appropriate directions.
Other Case Law
Gajanan Dattatray Gore v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Whether a court may grant regular or anticipatory bail conditioned upon an accused’s voluntary undertaking to deposit a sum of money, and whether such bail is liable to be cancelled when the accused, after securing release, resiles from that undertaking
BackgroundThe appellant was arrested on 17-8-2023 in registered with the S...
Read MoreShamhu Saran Agarwal and Company vs Additional Commissioner Grade-2 & Others
Whether goods can be detained and penalty imposed under Section 129 GST Act on the ground of undervaluation.
Facts :The petitioner challenged penalty order dated 20.12.2020 and appellate or...
Read MoreMuhammed Abdul Saini v. State Tax Officer & Others
Validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST/SGST Act and ITC eligibility, along with benefit of CBIC Circular Nos. 183/15/2022-GST and 193/5/2023-GST and correction of GSTR-3B errors.
BackgroundThe writ petition had challenged Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST/SGST Act...
Read More