GST INDIA Biz
GST India .biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

Commissioner of Trade and Tax, Delhi v. Shanti Kiran India (P) Ltd.

Date of Order: October 9, 2025
Case Law No: GIB-SC-2025-39
Subject: Entitlement of Input Tax Credit to purchasing dealer despite non-deposit of tax by selling dealer under DVAT (Section involved: Section 9(1) and Section 9(2)(g) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004)
Description:

Facts 
The issue before the Court was whether purchasing dealers who paid tax to registered selling dealers are entitled to Input Tax Credit even if the selling dealers failed to deposit the tax with the Government. The selling dealers were registered at the time of transactions but later defaulted and their registrations were cancelled. The Delhi High Court held that the purchasing dealers were bona fide and entitled to ITC. The Revenue challenged this decision before the Supreme Court. 


Court Decision:
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals and upheld the High Court’s decision. It held that where transactions and invoices are genuine and the selling dealer was registered at the time of transaction, ITC cannot be denied to bona fide purchasing dealers. The Court found no reason to interfere with the grant of ITC after due verification. 


Cases Referred by Court:
•    On Quest Merchandising India Pvt. Ltd. v. Government of NCT of Delhi 
•    Commissioner of Trade and Taxes v. Arise India Ltd. 
 

Other Case Law

Suresh Kumar vs Commissioner CGST Delhi North

Validity of service of GST order and limitation for passing order; effect of delayed uploading of DRC-07 (Section Involved: Section 169, Section 107, Section 73, Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017)

Case Facts:The petitioner challenged two GST orders and corresponding DRC-07 for...

Read More
Instakart Services Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

Challenge to constitutional validity of denial of Input Tax Credit due to supplier default; liability of recipient under GST regime (Sections involved: Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017; Rule 36(4) of CGST/KGST Rules)

Facts The petitioner, a logistics service provider registered under GST, ch...

Read More
Guru and Co. & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Whether notifications issued by the Central Government under Sections 9 and 11 of the CGST Act, 2017 can travel beyond the recommendations of the GST Council, and whether the GST Council has the power to ratify a notification already issued by the Central

BackgroundThe petitioners are suppliers of pulses (Moong Dhal, Thoor Dhal) selli...

Read More