Infac India Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of GST & Central Excise
Facts :
- Petitioner wrongly transitioned balance from Personal Ledger Account as input tax credit under Section 140 of CGST Act.
- Refund was sanctioned, but ₹9,25,366 was adjusted towards interest on such utilization.
- Petitioner contended that sufficient Input Tax Credit was available and there was no loss to revenue.
- Dispute arose on legality of interest adjustment while granting refund.
Court Decision:
- Petitioner ought to have claimed refund under Section 11B of Central Excise Act read with Section 142(3) of CGST Act.
- Wrong transition of credit was acknowledged, but tax liability was subsequently squared up using available Input Tax Credit.
- There was no loss to revenue, as sufficient credit existed.
Directions:
- Deduction of ₹9,25,366 towards interest held unsustainable.
- Impugned order modified to that extent.
- Respondent directed to refund ₹9,25,366 to petitioner.
- Refund to be made within 8 weeks.
Other Case Law
S.A. Aromatics Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors.
Validity of composite show cause notice for multiple financial years and multiple noticees – Sections 73, 74 and 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017 and UPGST Act, 2017.
Facts:Search and investigation proceedings were conducted by different GST autho...
Read MoreBuilders Association of Navi Mumbai v. Union of India
Levy of GST @ 18% on one-time lease premium charged by CIDCO on long-term (60-year) lease of plots to builders/developers in Navi Mumbai.
BackgroundCIDCO (City Industrial and Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd....
Read MoreMilroc Good Earth Developers vs Union of India & Ors.
Show Cause Notice – Clubbing of multiple financial years in a single show cause notice under Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 – validity of consolidated show cause notice for different tax periods.
Facts:The petitioner, a developer engaged in construction projects, challenged t...
Read More