GST INDIA Biz
GST India .biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

Ashirwad Food Industries vs Union of India & Ors.

Date of Order: February 9, 2026
Case Law No: GIB-JHC-2026-31
Subject: Quantum of deposite- in case alemond reduced in first appeal – GSTAT -Section 112(8)
Description:

Case Facts:

  • The petitioner challenged Order-in-Appeal dated 30.06.2025 confirming GST demand along with interest and penalty.
  • Statutory remedy of appeal before GST Appellate Tribunal was available, but the Tribunal was not fully functional.
  • Petitioner had already deposited ₹23.85 lakhs at the first appellate stage against an original demand of about ₹2.38 crores, later reduced to about ₹40 lakhs.
  • The dispute centered on whether further pre-deposit was required for filing appeal before the Tribunal.

Court Decision:

  • Court held that no further pre-deposit is required for filing appeal before GSTAT considering earlier deposit of ₹23.85 lakhs.
  • Petitioner permitted to file appeal within four weeks from the date of order.
  • Tribunal directed to decide appeal on merits without considering limitation if filed within the stipulated time.
  • If electronic filing is not possible, petitioner allowed to file appeal physically and same must be accepted without additional pre-deposit.
  • All issues on merits left open for adjudication by the Tribunal.
  • Writ petition disposed of without costs.

Other Case Law

Frontline Wind Energy Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Tax and a hundred per cent penalty confirmed on the entire annual-report value of a windmill undertaking sold as a going concern, contrary to the department’s own earlier notice accepting that the sale consideration was not taxable. At issue: an assessm

Background.  The petitioner had acquired a wind electric generator par...

Read More
GlobeOp Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax & Ors.

Validity of a GST demand order of ₹70,57,98,208/- confirmed by verbatim copying of the show cause notice, without independent application of mind to the petitioner's detailed replies — whether such an order amounts to non-application of mind and viola

BackgroundThe petitioner is engaged in providing financial back-office services ...

Read More
Pune Bar Association vs. Union of India and Others

Constitutional validity of Section 63(4) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) read with its Schedule, which mandates a certificate disclosing hash value of electronic records (Part A) and a declaration by an expert (Part B) as a pre-condition fo

BackgroundSection 65B of the erstwhile Indian Evidence Act, 1872 governed admiss...

Read More