GST INDIA Biz
GST India .biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

Ashirwad Food Industries vs Union of India & Ors.

Date of Order: February 9, 2026
Case Law No: GIB-JHC-2026-31
Subject: Quantum of deposite- in case alemond reduced in first appeal – GSTAT -Section 112(8)
Description:

Case Facts:

  • The petitioner challenged Order-in-Appeal dated 30.06.2025 confirming GST demand along with interest and penalty.
  • Statutory remedy of appeal before GST Appellate Tribunal was available, but the Tribunal was not fully functional.
  • Petitioner had already deposited ₹23.85 lakhs at the first appellate stage against an original demand of about ₹2.38 crores, later reduced to about ₹40 lakhs.
  • The dispute centered on whether further pre-deposit was required for filing appeal before the Tribunal.

Court Decision:

  • Court held that no further pre-deposit is required for filing appeal before GSTAT considering earlier deposit of ₹23.85 lakhs.
  • Petitioner permitted to file appeal within four weeks from the date of order.
  • Tribunal directed to decide appeal on merits without considering limitation if filed within the stipulated time.
  • If electronic filing is not possible, petitioner allowed to file appeal physically and same must be accepted without additional pre-deposit.
  • All issues on merits left open for adjudication by the Tribunal.
  • Writ petition disposed of without costs.

Other Case Law

Suresh Kumar vs Commissioner CGST Delhi North

Validity of service of GST order and limitation for passing order; effect of delayed uploading of DRC-07 (Section Involved: Section 169, Section 107, Section 73, Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017)

Case Facts:The petitioner challenged two GST orders and corresponding DRC-07 for...

Read More
Commissioner of Income Tax, Vidarbha vs. Godavaridevi Saraf

Whether an Income Tax Tribunal sitting outside the State of Madras is bound to follow a Madras High Court decision declaring Section 140A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as unconstitutional, and whether the penalty imposed under that section can be sustain

BACKGROUNDThe assessee filed a return of income for the assessment year 1968-69 ...

Read More
Maruti Enterprise v. Union of India & Ors.

Constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be denied to a bona fide purchasing dealer solely on account of the supplier's failure to deposit tax with the Government.

BACKGROUNDA group of petitioners (purchasing dealers) challenged Section 16(2)(c...

Read More