Guru Storage Batteries vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Background & Relevant Facts
The petitioner, Guru Storage Batteries, a partnership firm based in Nagpur, challenged the action of Respondent No. 3 — the State Tax Officer, Kamptee — in blocking its Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL). The blocking was carried out by Mr. Ujval Shrirampant Deshmukh, a State Tax Officer, who is admittedly an officer of a rank below that of Assistant Commissioner. The respondents sought to justify this action by relying on a Notification dated 24/01/2020, contending that the Commissioner had delegated the power to block ECL to Respondent No. 3. The petitioner also alleged that illegal recovery notices were being issued consequent to the said blocking.
Court Observations (Verbatim)
"A perusal of Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, indicates that such a blocking can be done by the Commissioner or an officer authorized by him in this behalf, not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner. Admittedly, the respondent No.3 does not fall within that category and is an Officer of the rank below that of the Assistant Commissioner."
"Though the Notification dated 24/1/2020 has been relied upon to contend that the power has now been delegated by the Commissioner to the respondent No.3 (page 104), the same is under the State GST Act, whereas Rule 86-A of the aforesaid Act would contemplate a delegation by way of amendment to the Rule. The Notification dated 24/01/2020, would be of no assistance to the respondents."
Final Verdict
The action of Respondent No. 3 in blocking the ECL was held to be without authority and was quashed and set aside. The petition was allowed with no costs, and the Rule was made absolute.
Cases Referred
- Dee Vee Projects Ltd. vs. Government of Maharashtra and Ors. — 2022(2) Bom.C.R. 239 (Bombay High Court)
Other Case Law
Bengal Engineering vs State of West Bengal & Ors
Legality of GST assessment exceeding Show Cause Notice amount and denial of personal hearing under Sections 75(7) and 75(4) of the West Bengal GST Act, 2017.
The Division Bench allowed the appeal and set aside the Adjudication Order dated...
Read MoreKing Enterprises vs. Union of India & Ors.
Validity of "negative blocking" of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, 2017, i.e., blocking ITC in excess of the actual credit balance available in the Electronic Credit Ledger.
Background & Relevant FactsThe petitioner, King Enterprises, challenged an o...
Read MoreTvl. Sam Enterprises v. State Tax Officer,
Validity of GST demand order passed under Section 73 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 without affording personal hearing to the taxpayer — violation of principles of natural justice
BACKGROUNDThe petitioner, a proprietary firm, was subjected to GST proceedings f...
Read More