Rishi Enterprises vs Additional Commissioner, Central Tax, Delhi North & Anr.
The petitioner challenged an adjudication order imposing tax and penalty on the ground that it was barred by limitation. The factual matrix revealed that the show cause notice was issued invoking extended limitation, and though the order was signed within time, it was uploaded on the GST portal after expiry of the statutory period.
The Court held that for the purposes of limitation, the date on which the order is uploaded and communicated to the assessee is relevant. Mere signing of the order within limitation does not save it if it is not issued or uploaded within the prescribed period. Since the order was uploaded beyond limitation, it was held to be time-barred and set aside.
Case laws referred:
Suman Jeet Agarwal v. Income Tax Officer, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 4253
HCL Infotech Ltd. v. Commissioner, Commercial Tax, 2024 SCC OnLine All 5769
Other Case Law
Commissioner of CGST v. Deepak Khandelwal
Challenge to Delhi High Court order concerning proceedings under the CGST Act.
The petitioner, Commissioner of CGST, filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) befor...
Read MoreM/s Barkataki Print and Media Services vs Union of India & Ors.
Limitation for passing adjudication orders under Section 73 of CGST Act
The petitioners challenged adjudication orders passed under Section 73(9) of the...
Read MoreBaba Minerals vs Union of India & Ors.
Cancellation of GST registration and denial of opportunity of hearing
The petitioner challenged cancellation of GST registration on the ground that th...
Read More