M/s Tirupati Steel vs Union of India & Ors.
The petitioner challenged provisional attachment of its bank account under Section 83 of the CGST Act. The factual background revealed that the attachment continued beyond one year from the date of the order.
The Court held that Section 83(2) clearly mandates that provisional attachment shall cease after expiry of one year. Any continuation beyond the statutory period is illegal. The provisional attachment was quashed.
Case laws referred:
Krish Overseas v. Commissioner of Central Tax, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 2865
Other Case Law
Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Others
Constitutional Validity of GST Levy on Lotteries under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
The petitioner, Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challengi...
Read MoreSance Laboratories Private Limited vs Union of India & Ors.
Validity of prolonged investigation and withholding of export refunds by DGGI
The petitioners challenged prolonged investigation by the Directorate General of...
Read MoreChief Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax & Others v. M/s Safari Retreats Private Ltd. & Others
Constitutional Validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — Denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on Construction of Immovable Property
The respondents, including M/s Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd., were engaged in constr...
Read More