Mehul Mamgain vs Union of India & Ors.
The petitioner sought directions against GST authorities for action against a private party allegedly claiming wrongful ITC. The factual background showed that the grievance was essentially private in nature.
The Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be invoked to settle private disputes. The proper remedy was to approach the statutory authorities. The writ petition was dismissed with costs.
Other Case Law
L & T IHI Consortium vs Union of India & Ors.
GST on advances received under infrastructure contracts and denial of ITC
The petitioner consortium challenged levy of GST on advances received for execut...
Read MoreCommissioner of CGST v. Deepak Khandelwal
Challenge to Delhi High Court order concerning proceedings under the CGST Act.
The petitioner, Commissioner of CGST, filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) befor...
Read MoreProxima Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors.
Disregard of appellate order while deciding refund claim
The petitioner challenged rejection of refund on limitation despite an appellate...
Read More