M/s Shree Shakti Minerals vs Commissioner, Central GST & Ors.
The petitioner challenged an order dismissing its statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act as barred by limitation. The factual background showed that though the appellate authority correctly held that it had no power to condone delay beyond the prescribed period, the petitioner invoked writ jurisdiction seeking restoration of the appeal.
The Court held that while statutory authorities are bound by limitation under Section 107, the High Court’s powers under Article 226 are not so constrained. In the interest of justice, the impugned order was quashed and the statutory appeal was restored subject to compliance with statutory pre-deposit and other conditions.
Case laws referred:
Plenuel Nexus Private Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner (HQ), 2023 SCC OnLine Ker 15574
Assistant Commissioner (CT) LTU, Kakinada v. Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Ltd., (2020) 19 SCC 681
Other Case Law
Rinkumoni Bordoloi (Wife of Late Satyajit Bordoloi) vs Union of India & Ors.
Order under Section 73 passed beyond limitation
The petitioner assailed an order-in-original passed under Section 73(9) contendi...
Read MoreUnion of India & Others v. M/s HCC VCCL Joint Venture
Challenge to Delhi High Court Order in Writ Petition concerning Contractual and Tax Dispute under GST
The petitioners, the Union of India and others, filed a Special Leave Petition b...
Read MoreCentral GST Delhi–III v. Delhi International Airport Ltd.
Levy of Service Tax on User Development Fee Collected by Airport Operators
The appeals were filed by the service tax authorities against orders of the Cust...
Read More