Chaurasiya Zarda Bhandar vs State of U.P. & Others
The writ petition was allowed. The assessment and demand order dated 29.08.2024, as well as the consequential attachment order dated 11.09.2025, were quashed and set aside.
The Court held that the show cause notice for the financial year 2019–20 proposed recovery of tax amounting to Rs. 29,07,002/- and did not contain any proposal for imposition of interest or penalty.
However, the impugned order imposed interest and penalty under CGST and SGST totaling Rs. 55,71,191/-. The Court found that such imposition was contrary to Section 75(7), which provides that the amount of tax, interest and penalty demanded in the order shall not be in excess of the amount specified in the notice and no demand shall be confirmed on grounds other than those specified in the notice.
Since the show cause notice contained no reference to interest or penalty, the impugned order was held to be unsustainable and arbitrary.
The matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority to pass fresh orders in accordance with law.
Other Case Law
Anchor Shipping Services v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Challenge to ex parte GST assessment orders on grounds of improper service and violation of natural justice
Facts :The petitioner, a registered GST dealer, was subjected to assessment proc...
Read MoreHoosein Kasam Dada (India) Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Whether amendment imposing pre-deposit condition for appeal applies retrospectively and affects vested right of appeal
Facts :The assessee filed a sales tax return in 1947 and assessment proceedings ...
Read MoreSPL Motors (P) Ltd. vs Union of India and Others
Whether Rule 86A CGST Rules permits blocking of ITC in Electronic Credit Ledger beyond available balance (negative blocking).
Facts :The petitioner, a registered GST dealer, challenged the action of the res...
Read More