Wingtech Mobile Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy
Facts :
The petitioner was subjected to an assessment order dated 02.08.2025 raising a demand of over ₹244 crores. Prior to and immediately after the assessment, the authorities provisionally attached bank accounts and issued recovery notice dated 19.08.2025, resulting in recovery of ₹170 crores. Due to attachment and recovery, the petitioner could not file appeal as it was unable to arrange the statutory pre-deposit. The petitioner challenged the recovery, attachment, and conditions imposed by the Department.
Court Decision:
The Court held that once the statutory pre-deposit requirement under Section 107(6) is satisfied, a deemed stay of recovery operates and further coercive steps are not permissible. It directed that the amount already recovered be adjusted towards the 10% pre-deposit and the balance be refunded upon furnishing undertaking by the petitioner. The Court further held that restrictions on use of funds can be imposed only to safeguard revenue interests, and directed the petitioner to maintain specified balance and retain sale proceeds till disposal of appeal. The writ petition was disposed of with directions for refund subject to undertakings and adjustment of pre-deposit.
Other Case Law
Lovelesh Singhal v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs & Ors.
Validity of CBIC Circular No. 3/3/2017 dated 05.07.2017 — Authority to Assign
Background & IssueThe petitioner, proprietor of M/s Shivani Overseas, challe...
Read MoreEmerson Process Management (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
FORM GST ITC-02 blocked by a departmental endorsement embossed on the statutory form itself, insisting that transferor and transferee be of the same State or Union Territory. At issue: the legality of that condition and the manner in which departmental re
Background. The petitioner, engaged in the manufacture and sale of sa...
Read MoreAlstom Transport India Limited v. Additional Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise (Appeals)
Partial transfer of amalgamation credit through FORM GST ITC-02, with the retained balance separately claimed and encashed as an export refund, later reversed on departmental review. At issue: whether FORM GST ITC-02 is the sole route for such credit, and
Background. By NCLT order dated 10.08.2023, three entities including ...
Read More