Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, Delhi v. Arise India Limited
Facts:
The case arose from a batch of matters decided by the Delhi High Court concerning denial of input tax credit to purchasing dealers under the Delhi VAT Act. The tax authorities challenged the High Court’s ruling, which had granted relief to dealers claiming bona fide purchase transactions. The petitioner filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court against the High Court judgment dated 26.10.2017. The issue involved whether purchasing dealers could be denied input tax credit due to default by selling dealers.
Court Decision:
The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment of the Delhi High Court and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. The Court, however, granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the High Court with necessary particulars in cases where transactions were allegedly not bona fide and seek appropriate directions.
Other Case Law
COMMISSIONER, CGST & CENTRAL EXCISE v. GODREJ TYSON FOODS LIMITED
Whether printing the manufacturer's name and address on packaging constitutes use of a “brand name” for exemption under Notification No. 02/2017-CT(Rate). Whether institutional supplies qualify as “pre-packaged and labelled” goods under Notificati
BACKGROUNDThe taxpayer supplied frozen poultry products to institutional consume...
Read MoreSavitri Industries v. Chief Commissioner of CT & GST
Input tax credit disallowed under Section 16(2)(c) solely because the supplier had not filed its returns, notwithstanding that the tax was reflected in the recipient’s FORM GSTR-2A. At issue: whether a writ court will re-examine the correctness of that
Background. By an order in FORM GST DRC-07 dated 25.02.2025 under Sec...
Read MoreLGW Industries Limited & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
ITC Eligibility from Fake Suppliers and Validity of Section 16(2)(c) CGST/WBGST Act.
BackgroundThe petitioners challenged notices denying ITC on purchases and demand...
Read More