Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Ballygunge Charge & Ors. v. Suncraft Energy Private Limited & Ors.
Facts :
The petitioners filed Special Leave Petitions challenging the judgment and order dated 02.08.2023 passed by the High Court at Calcutta. The dispute pertained to tax demand raised against the respondent. The matter was placed before the Supreme Court for admission, including an application for condonation of delay.
Court Decision:
The Supreme Court condoned the delay but declined to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 136. The Court noted the facts and circumstances of the case and the relatively low tax demand, and dismissed the Special Leave Petitions.
Other Case Law
Kalaimahal Cements Private Limited vs. The Commercial Tax Officer
Challenge to blocking of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Rule 86A of the GST Rules in the Electronic Credit Ledger of the Petitioner, where the petitioner's own Managing Director's statement indicated availment of ITC on bogus invoices.
BackgroundThe petitioner, Kalaimahal Cements Private Limited (GSTIN: 33AAGCK4135...
Read MoreK-9 Enterprises vs. State of Karnataka
Legality of blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) under Rule 86A of CGST Rules, 2017 without pre-decisional hearing and without independent application of mind.
BackgroundThe appellants — GST-registered businesses dealing in lead, lead scr...
Read MoreE2E Supply Chain Solutions Limited v. Deputy Commissioner (ST) GST Appeal,
Exclusion of rectification period under Section 161 while computing appeal limitation under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
BackgroundThe batch of writ petitions arose from appeals that had been rejected ...
Read More