Commissioner of Trade and Tax, Delhi v. Shanti Kiran India (P) Ltd.
Facts
The issue before the Court was whether purchasing dealers who paid tax to registered selling dealers are entitled to Input Tax Credit even if the selling dealers failed to deposit the tax with the Government. The selling dealers were registered at the time of transactions but later defaulted and their registrations were cancelled. The Delhi High Court held that the purchasing dealers were bona fide and entitled to ITC. The Revenue challenged this decision before the Supreme Court.
Court Decision:
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals and upheld the High Court’s decision. It held that where transactions and invoices are genuine and the selling dealer was registered at the time of transaction, ITC cannot be denied to bona fide purchasing dealers. The Court found no reason to interfere with the grant of ITC after due verification.
Cases Referred by Court:
• On Quest Merchandising India Pvt. Ltd. v. Government of NCT of Delhi
• Commissioner of Trade and Taxes v. Arise India Ltd.
Other Case Law
Guru Storage Batteries vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Validity of blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) by an officer below the rank of Assistant Commissioner under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Background & Relevant FactsThe petitioner, Guru Storage Batteries, a partner...
Read MoreTvl R.P.G. Traders vs. State Tax Officer & Anr.
Levy of late fee and general penalty for non-filing of annual return – Sections 47, 125 and 73 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act, 2017.
Facts:The petitioner failed to file the annual return under Section 44 of the Ta...
Read MoreKaran Agencies & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Blocking of ITC and Constitutional Validity of Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act.
BackgroundThe batch of petitions involved common questions of fact and law conce...
Read More