Commissioner of Trade and Tax, Delhi v. Shanti Kiran India (P) Ltd.
Facts
The issue before the Court was whether purchasing dealers who paid tax to registered selling dealers are entitled to Input Tax Credit even if the selling dealers failed to deposit the tax with the Government. The selling dealers were registered at the time of transactions but later defaulted and their registrations were cancelled. The Delhi High Court held that the purchasing dealers were bona fide and entitled to ITC. The Revenue challenged this decision before the Supreme Court.
Court Decision:
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals and upheld the High Court’s decision. It held that where transactions and invoices are genuine and the selling dealer was registered at the time of transaction, ITC cannot be denied to bona fide purchasing dealers. The Court found no reason to interfere with the grant of ITC after due verification.
Cases Referred by Court:
• On Quest Merchandising India Pvt. Ltd. v. Government of NCT of Delhi
• Commissioner of Trade and Taxes v. Arise India Ltd.
Other Case Law
State of Jharkhand & Ors. vs. BLA Infrastructure Private Limited
Refund of statutory pre-deposit paid for maintaining an appeal under Section 107(6) of the Jharkhand GST Act, 2017 — whether governed by Section 107(6) read with Section 115, or by Section 54 of the Jharkhand GST Act.
BACKGROUND The assessee had made a statutory pre-deposit under Section 107(...
Read MoreChief Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax & Ors. Vs. Safari Retreats Private Ltd. & Ors.
Eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on construction of immovable property used for renting (Section 17(5)(c) & (d), Section 16, CGST Act, 2017 – Blocked Credit, Constitutional Validity, ITC on Immovable Property)
Case Facts:The respondent constructed a shopping mall for leasing purposes and p...
Read MoreZeba Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Cancellation/annulment of bail – offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC involving forged educational degrees and organised fraud. Scope of appellate interference in bail orders; suppression of material facts and criminal antecedents in bail
Facts:An FIR was registered alleging an organised racket involving forged LL.B. ...
Read More