GST INDIA Biz
GST India .biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

Murliwala Minerals Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors.

Date of Order: September 29, 2014
Case Law No: GIB-SC-2014-04
Subject: Dismissal of Special Leave Petition arising out of orders of the High Court of Jharkhand — maintainability of Letters Patent Appeal kept open.
Description:

BACKGROUND 
The petitioner approached the Supreme Court by way of Special Leave Petitions challenging the final judgment dated 22.11.2012 passed in a Writ Petition before the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi and the subsequent order dated 28.04.2014 passed in a Letters Patent Appeal arising therefrom. The petitions were filed with applications for condonation of delay in filing and refiling.

 

CRUCIAL COURT OBSERVATIONS (Verbatim)

The Supreme Court passed only the following operative order and made no detailed observations on merits:

"Delay condoned. The special leave petitions are dismissed. However, the issue relating to maintainability of Letters Patent Appeal, is kept open."

 

FINAL VERDICT 
The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions after condoning the delay, without going into the merits. The question of maintainability of the Letters Patent Appeal was expressly kept open. 👎

Other Case Law

C.C.E., Bhubaneswar-I vs M/s. Champdany Industries Limited

Classification of carpets containing jute, cotton and polypropylene under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985—whether classifiable as jute carpets or under residuary heading.

Court Decision:The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue and ...

Read More
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra through the Secretary to the Government Revenue Dept. & Ors.

Whether the GST Appellate Tribunal, constituted under the CGST Act, 2017, has jurisdiction to pass interim orders (including stay of recovery) pending disposal of an appeal before it.

BACKGROUNDAn Order-in-Original dated 18th December 2023 confirmed a tax liabilit...

Read More
Ravinder Mehta v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Regular bail in a trap case under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — whether an accused can be kept in custody where the charge-sheet stands filed but sanction for prosecution has still not been granted, leaving the trial court unable

B A C K G R O U N DThe appellant figured as an accused in FIR registered in Dece...

Read More