GST INDIA Biz
GST India .biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

Frontline Wind Energy Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Date of Order: January 2, 2025
Case Law No: GIB-MHC-2025-59
Subject: Tax and a hundred per cent penalty confirmed on the entire annual-report value of a windmill undertaking sold as a going concern, contrary to the department’s own earlier notice accepting that the sale consideration was not taxable. At issue: an assessm
Description:

Background.  
The petitioner had acquired a wind electric generator park of twenty windmills by slump sale in 2015 and sold that business to Bilal Match Works under a sale of business agreement dated 14.06.2019 for a consideration of Rs. 9,50,00,000. Relying on the figure of Rs. 10,34,32,205 appearing in the petitioner’s sixth annual report for FY 2019-20, being cost of machinery plus profit on sale, the assessment order dated 26.11.2021 confirmed tax of Rs. 93,08,898 each under CGST and SGST together with penalty at one hundred per cent under Section 122(1).

Observations of the Court.  
The Court pointed to the department’s own notice dated 21.10.2021, which had recorded that where a person ceases to be a taxable person, goods forming part of the assets of the business are deemed to be supplied immediately before he ceases to be a taxable person unless the business is transferred as a going concern to another person, in terms of entry 4(c)(i) of Schedule II, and which had categorically admitted, on the strength of the agreement filed, that the consideration of Rs. 9,50,00,000 was not exigible to tax, proposing to bring only the differential of Rs. 84,32,205 to tax.

The impugned order having nonetheless confirmed the demand on the entire Rs. 10,34,32,205 taken from the annual report, the Court held the demand to be unsustainable, arbitrary and contrary to that notice.

Final verdict.  
The writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the respondent to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, within eight weeks from receipt of the order.

Other Case Law

Uber India Systems Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Central Tax & Ors.

Validity of common Show Cause Notice for multiple tax periods – Proceedings under the CGST Act relating to issuance of Show Cause Notice covering multiple financial years.

Facts:The petitioner received a show cause notice dated 12.06.2024 proposing lev...

Read More
Raman Enterprises v. Commissioner of SGST Delhi & Anr.

Whether a Rectification Order under Section 161 of the CGST Act, 2017 rejecting a rectification application filed by the assessee — passed mechanically without affording a hearing and without recording reasons — is sustainable, in view of the third pr

BackgroundA Show Cause Notice was issued on 25th September 2023 for the tax peri...

Read More
IDFC First Bank Limited v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Scrutiny, audit and a DRC-07 demand order pursued for years against three companies long after their amalgamation and cancellation of registration, notwithstanding repeated intimation. At issue: the validity of proceedings conducted throughout against a n

Background.  By order dated 12.12.2018 of the NCLT, Chennai, Capital F...

Read More