G.R. Infra Projects Limited, Ratlam v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
BACKGROUND
The dispute concerned a show-cause notice dated 13.06.2025 for AY 2018-19. The assessee contended that the notice was beyond Section 73 limitation. The State sought to justify the proceedings under Section 74 by relying on allegations of fraud and suppression elaborated in its counter affidavit.
COURT OBSERVATIONS
The Supreme Court held that the Section 73 limitation expired on 28.02.2025 after applying the statutory extensions and the COVID-19 exclusion. The SCN dated 13.06.2025 was therefore beyond Section 73 limitation. The Court further held that Section 74 cannot be invoked merely by mechanically using the words fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression; the factual basis must emanate from the SCN itself.
FINAL VERDICT
The Supreme Court allowed the Civil Appeal, set aside the High Court's order and quashed the impugned Section 74 show-cause notice.
Cases Referred by Court:
• Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020 — Supreme Court of India — relied upon for exclusion of the COVID-19 period while computing statutory limitation, including the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022.
Other Case Law
Union of India & Ors. vs. Shantanu Sanjay Hundekari & Anr. Etc.
Challenge to Bombay High Court judgment quashing show cause notices imposing penalty under Sections 122(1A) and 137 of the CGST Act on an employee for alleged GST evasion by the company.
Court DecisionThe Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions filed by t...
Read MorePatanjali Foods Limited v. Assistant Commissioner CGST, Narela Division & Ors.
A composite demand spanning periods both before and after approval of a resolution plan that took over an insolvent company on a clean-slate basis. At issue: the operative cut-off date separating dues extinguished by the plan from dues still open to recov
Background. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. underwent insolvency proceedin...
Read MoreA.G. and Sons HUF & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Whether an order passed under the CGST Act by an officer who did not personally conduct the hearing violates the principle of natural justice — specifically the maxim
BackgroundAn impugned order dated 30th December 2025 was passed by Mr. Debjit Ba...
Read More