GST INDIA Biz
GST India .biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

Muhammed Abdul Saini v. State Tax Officer & Others

Date of Order: November 6, 2024
Case Law No: GIB-KERHC-2024-20
Subject: Validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST/SGST Act and ITC eligibility, along with benefit of CBIC Circular Nos. 183/15/2022-GST and 193/5/2023-GST and correction of GSTR-3B errors.
Description:

Background

The writ petition had challenged Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST/SGST Act to the extent that it required an assessee claiming ITC to ensure that the supplier of the inputs had actually paid the output tax to the Government. The learned Single Judge had rejected the challenge to the statutory provision in a batch of writ petitions. The Division Bench had earlier affirmed that decision in Nahasshukoor v. Assistant Commissioner II Circle, Alappuzha and Others.

The appellant also submitted that certain mistakes made while entering figures in Form GSTR-3B could not be brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge when the writ petition was heard. The Single Judge had, however, granted liberty to claim the benefit of two CBIC circulars before the appropriate authority and directed the authority to examine and process the claim. The appellant sought an opportunity to place the GSTR-3B errors also before the assessing authority along with the claims under the circulars.

Court Observation

The Court held that the principal challenge to Section 16(2)(c) had already received approval from a Division Bench in Nahasshukoor. Consequently, the challenge to the statutory provision was bound to fail.

However, the Court accepted the appellant’s request regarding the mistakes in Form GSTR-3B. It considered it appropriate to extend the time granted by the Single Judge by one month so that the appellant could claim the benefit of the two specified circulars and also raise the issue concerning errors in Form GSTR-3B before the adjudicating authority.

Final Verdict

The writ appeal was dismissed insofar as it challenged the statutory provisions, and the findings of the learned Single Judge were otherwise upheld.

The Court extended by one month from 6 November 2024 the time for approaching the assessing authority to claim the benefit of Circular Nos. 183/15/2022-GST and 193/5/2023-GST and to raise the issue of errors in Form GSTR-3B. The assessing authority was directed to consider and adjudicate the matter expeditiously. The writ appeal was accordingly disposed of.

Cases Referred by Court

  1. Nahasshukoor v. Assistant Commissioner II Circle, Alappuzha and Others — High Court of Kerala — 2024.

 

Other Case Law

Santosh Mani Mishra (Revenue) v. M/s Islam Trading Company, Baheri, Bareilly

Section 129(3) tax and penalty for transporting iron goods without an e-way bill – whether later production of documents cures the lapse and whether a repeated lapse shows intent to evade.

BackgroundOn 27.03.2018 the Mobile Squad, Bareilly intercepted iron goods moving...

Read More
Anil Kumar Hajelay & Ors. v. Hon’ble High Court of Delhi,

Urgency of Integration of Section 105 BNSS

Facts of the CaseThe present proceedings arose out of an application filed by th...

Read More
Shanti Kiran India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Trade & Tax Department

Denial of Input Tax Credit to purchasing dealer due to non-payment of tax by selling dealer under DVAT (Section involved: Section 9(1) and Section 9(2) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004)

Facts :The appellant, a registered dealer, purchased goods from registered selli...

Read More