GST INDIA Biz
GST India .biz — Case Law Details
Detailed GST Case Law Information

R.K. TRANSPORT & CONSTRUCTIONS LIMITED v. STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

Date of Order: June 13, 2025
Case Law No: GIB-JHC-2025-64
Subject: Supplier’s Failure to Deposit GST and State’s Duty to Act under Section 76(2).
Description:

BACKGROUND

The petitioner had obtained commercial vehicle rental/hiring services and paid the invoices along with GST. The tax paid, however, did not appear in the recipient's GSTR-2A because the supplier had not filed GSTR-01. Consequently, the petitioner was unable to utilise the corresponding ITC.

Representations were made to the tax authorities requesting action against the supplier for collecting GST without depositing it with the Government. The authorities took the position that the supplier fell within the Central GST jurisdiction and therefore action could not be initiated by the State authorities.

COURT OBSERVATION

The Court held that the stand of the official respondents was contrary to Section 76(1) and (2) of the Jharkhand GST Act. The provision applies to “every person” who collects an amount representing GST and does not pay it to the Government, including a person who is not registered under the JGST Act.

The Court further held that the authorities could not refuse action merely because the supplier was registered under the Central GST authorities. The State authorities were under a duty to initiate proceedings under Section 76(2). The Court also rejected the plea of res judicata because the earlier writ petition had not resulted in adjudication on merits.

FINAL VERDICT

The writ petition was allowed with costs of ₹1,00,000/- payable by the supplier to the petitioner. The official respondents were directed to initiate proceedings under Section 76 of the Jharkhand GST Act against the supplier for collecting tax and not crediting it to the State Government.

Other Case Law

Vodafone Idea Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 78(1), New Delhi & Ors.

TDS Refund with Interest under Sections 244A & 244A(1A) and Adjustment against Outstanding Demands.

BACKGROUNDThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had allowed the assessee's appeals f...

Read More
Biharilal Chhaterpal vs. State of U.P. & Ors.

Seizure of goods and penalty for absence of e-way bill in inter-State movement – Sections 129 and 68 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 20(xv) of the IGST Act, 2017 and Rule 138 of the CGST Rules, 2017.

Facts:The petitioner’s goods (barbed wire) being transported from Raipur (Chha...

Read More
M/s Flora Kingdom Farm Resort v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Karnataka

ITC on goods and services used to construct a resort building – blocked under Section 17(5)(d) after the retrospective 2025 amendment (“plant and machinery”) and Safari Retreats.

BackgroundThe appellant, which runs a resort at Udupi supplying accommodation, r...

Read More