Union of India & Anr. v. Vodafone Idea Limited
Background
The Union of India filed the present Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court against the judgment and order dated 29 April 2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in W.P. No. 6637/2025. The record identifies the Union of India and another as petitioners and Vodafone Idea Limited as the respondent.
The matter was placed before the Supreme Court on 07 September 2026. An application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP was also before the Court. After hearing the counsel appearing for both sides and examining the materials available on record, the Supreme Court considered whether the impugned order of the High Court called for interference.
Court Observation
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the materials on record, the Supreme Court expressly recorded that it was “not inclined to interfere” with the impugned order passed by the High Court. The Court therefore declined to exercise its jurisdiction to interfere with the Bombay High Court's order.
The order does not record any detailed discussion on the underlying GST dispute or the reasoning adopted by the Bombay High Court. The Supreme Court's recorded consideration is limited to hearing the parties, examining the materials on record, and deciding not to interfere with the impugned order.
Final Verdict
The Supreme Court first condoned the delay in filing the Special Leave Petition. Thereafter, having heard the parties and examined the material on record, it declined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of the Bombay High Court.
Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed. The Court further directed that the pending application(s), if any, would stand disposed of.
Other Case Law
Raj Shekhar Pandey v. State Tax Officer
Validity of GST proceedings initiated after cancellation of registration and service of notice through portal
Facts :The petitioner challenged the show cause notice dated 16.11.2024 and orde...
Read MoreA. M. Marketplaces Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors.
Demand and adjudication – Minimum time gap between issuance of notice and passing of order under Sections 73(2) and 73(10) of the CGST Act, 2017.
Facts:The petitioner challenged the show cause notice dated 18.11.2024 and the a...
Read MoreCommissioner of Trade and Taxes, Delhi v. Arise India Limited
Validity of denial of input tax credit under Delhi VAT law; scope of liability for purchasing dealers (Sections involved: Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 – provisions relating to Input Tax Credit)
Facts:The case arose from a batch of matters decided by the Delhi High Court con...
Read More